About JEEPSJournal of Education and Educational Policy Studies (JEEPS) is an open access, peer-reviewed academic journal published by EWA Publishing. JEEPS is published bimonthly. JEEPS present latest theoretical and methodological discussions to bear on the scholarly works covering education, psychology, educational policy, sports science and Marxism. Situated at the forefront of the interdisciplinary fields of education, this journal seeks to bring together the scholarly insights cantering on education, educational policy, and relevant subfields that trace to the discipline of psychology, sports science, and Marxism. JEEPS is dedicated to the gathering of intellectual views by scholars and policymakers. The articles included are relevant for scholars, policymakers, and students of education, and otherwise interdisciplinary programs.For more details of the JEEPS scope, please refer to the Aim & Scope page. For more information about the journal, please refer to the FAQ page or contact info@ewapublishing.org. |
| Aims & scope of JEEPS are: ·Education ·Psychology ·Educational Policy ·Sports Science ·Marxism |
Article processing charge
A one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) of 450 USD (US Dollars) applies to papers accepted after peer review. excluding taxes.
Open access policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. (CC BY 4.0 license).
Your rights
These licenses afford authors copyright while enabling the public to reuse and adapt the content.
Peer-review process
Our blind and multi-reviewer process ensures that all articles are rigorously evaluated based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the field.
Editors View full editorial board
Huntsville, USA
mallen@shsu.edu
Leeds, UK
C.Eugeni@leeds.ac.uk
Notre Dame, USA
kbuhring@saintmarys.edu
Boston, USA
r.arrowood@northeastern.edu
Latest articles View all articles
Louis Althusser's theory of "interpellation" posits that ideology constitutes individuals as subjects compliant with specific social relations through the everyday practices of state apparatuses such as schools and the media. In the digital age, generative artificial intelligence, as a non-neutral "techno-ideological" apparatus, is profoundly reconfiguring this mechanism. Through automated, personalized, and concealed forms of "digital interpellation", it achieves deep discipline over individual cognition and behavior. A structural coupling emerges between technical logic and social logic: the pattern-reproductive capacity of technology efficiently serves the reproduction of social relations, while the social pursuit of order and control, in turn, drives technological evolution.
Against the backdrop of the intertwined trends of economic globalization and de-globalization, the internationalization of higher education has emerged as a key factor reshaping the global talent market landscape and influencing the employment competitiveness of graduates. As core representatives in the global higher education sector, China and the United States exhibit fundamental differences in their internationalization development paths, talent cultivation logics, and market adaptation models. These differences directly lead to distinct characteristics between graduates of the two countries in terms of employment capability composition, international market adaptability, and cross-cultural work competence. Based on human capital theory and global competence theory, this paper adopts literature research and comparative analysis methods to systematically examine the divergent impacts of higher education internationalization on the employment competitiveness of graduates in China and the United States from four dimensions: philosophy, model, effect, and root cause. The study refines the core dimensions of employment competitiveness, and combined with scholars' survey data and case studies, it finds that China's higher education internationalization is mainly policy-driven, with a focus on knowledge imparting and uneven resource distribution. It significantly enhances graduates' professional hard power, but has obvious shortcomings in cultivating soft skills such as cross-cultural practice and critical thinking. In contrast, the United States is market demand-oriented, emphasizing capacity building and multi-stakeholder collaboration. Through a well-established system, it achieves the simultaneous improvement of graduates' hard and soft power, with remarkable effects in internship and cross-cultural training mechanisms. The root causes of these differences lie in the divergent adaptation logics of the two countries' educational traditions, institutional environments, and labor market structures. By analyzing these differences and their internal mechanisms, this paper provides targeted references for China's higher education internationalization to shift from scale expansion to quality improvement and build a talent cultivation system adapted to the international market. It also offers practical insights for relevant interdisciplinary research and tripartite collaborative education.
Project-Based Learning (PBL) has demonstrated considerable effectiveness in fostering scientific attitudes among primary school students. This study conducts an in-depth analysis of the Grade 5 Science textbook published by the Education Science Press and selects the lesson "Building Boats with Floating Materials" as a suitable case for PBL-oriented instructional design. The story of Noah's Ark from the Bible is employed to construct a cognitively challenging and thought-provoking scenario, immersing students in dual challenges involving both engineering and ethical considerations. Students are thereby guided to adopt the dual roles of engineers and decision-makers, engaging in dynamic reasoning between scientific evidence and value judgment, with the aim of cultivating scientific attitudes. The effectiveness of this PBL approach is evaluated through teacher and student interviews. The findings indicate that employing project-based learning to cultivate scientific attitudes in primary school students receives strong positive affirmation. Based on the teaching practice, four pedagogical recommendations are proposed: prioritizing cognitive development in scenario design; flexibly and appropriately adapting instructional content; maintaining classroom order while fostering a supportive learning environment; and promoting the participation of students with higher levels of dependency in classroom activities.
Against the backdrop of global industrial transformation and upgrading, as well as structural changes in the demand for skilled talent, vocational training in higher education has become a core pillar for enhancing national industrial competitiveness. Employing the methods of literature review and comparative analysis, this paper systematically compares the higher education vocational training models of China and the United States across five key dimensions: policy frameworks, training objectives, curriculum systems, industry–education integration, and faculty development. The findings indicate that the United States has developed a decentralized model characterized by market-driven dynamics, decentralized governance, and symbiotic partnerships between educational institutions and enterprises, whereas China has established a centralized model marked by government leadership, systematic planning, and institution-centered implementation. These differences stem from the adaptive logic of distinct institutional contexts, industrial structures, and labor market characteristics. The U.S. model demonstrates strengths in market responsiveness and practical effectiveness, while the Chinese model highlights advantages in scale and equity. On this basis, the paper proposes pathways for optimizing China's vocational training model: building a dual mechanism that combines government guidance with market-driven forces, deepening modular curriculum reform, improving long-term collaborative mechanisms for industry–education integration, and strengthening the development of "dual-qualified” faculty. This study provides localized insights for the high-quality development of vocational education in China and contributes to addressing the persistent mismatch between skilled talent cultivation and industrial demand.
Volumes View all volumes
Announcements View all announcements
Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies
We pledge to our journal community:
We're committed: we put diversity and inclusion at the heart of our activities...
Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies (JEEPS) are solely those of the individual authors and contributors...
Indexing
The published articles will be submitted to following databases below: